Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Project1 Refection
The process of this project was slightly different than I am used to at my home University. Here, we researched as a group and at the same time came up with concepts. At home, the research and "process" of coming up with concepts lasts for a longer period of time. Here I was immersed in my chosen concept from the very beginning. This could be good and bad. On one hand, here you will spend the majority of the time developing the concept you have chose, and therefore it will look complete. However, since the research/development phase is so much shorter, this could negatively affect the overall concept and purpose of the final design. Having this background, of importance of project research INSIGHTS, I feel my project was well influenced by thorough research.
When I began working on the model, I was very nervous because I didn't know if my mini-models would translate well onto the real material I was using. I decided I would up-cyle wool from a stained coat to make the model and decided that would be a feasible option for low-cost and low-earth-impact manufacture. The final model came out kind of cute! I was hoping it wouldn't be "too cute" so that many ages of children would want to use it, and I feel I succeeded. It has a "muppet" look for younger kids- while at the same time having an "UglyDolls" (popular stuffed animal in the US) appeal for older kids.
Project1 Rationale
‘Security-Kid’ Rationale
Evacuating for a bushfire is a traumatic experience for a child.
My concept aims to relieve a child’s confusion, anxiety, and worry- before and during bushfire evacuation. This concept is a kit designed for children (approximately 3-8years) that promotes bushfire education, provides psychological comfort and a practical assurance of safety. This product uses up-cycled wool materials to build the main section. With low-cost of manufacture, the kit is also accessible to low-income families.
"What we are finding is that children are very much affected by their exposure to trauma, that many children will have concerns that they might die'' (Prof Newman, Herald Sun).
Education: The “Security-Kid” would be distributed to primary schools to promote bushfire education. Schoolteachers would dedicate one a day a year to bushfire awareness. During this day, children will become familiar with the use of the “Security-Kid” and learn methods of individual prevention of bushfires. The kit facilitates questions that children often have difficulty verbalizing. It serves as a barrier for a child to express feelings and in tern, relieves confusion.
Items provided in the kit:
Smoke mask
Goggles
Whistle
Torch/light
Recommended personal items:
Snacks
Favorite toy
Psychological comfort: In addition to practical needs, the elements of the kit provide psychological comfort for a child evacuating their home in a bushfire. For a child, knowing they have everything they need to evacuate, eases anxiety during that stressful time.
“Security-Kid” is also a comfort object during stressful times and a safe- heaven for the child's favorite possessions. The “huggable” bag designates a home for a comfort object commonly carried among children. Prior to evacuation, children are familiarized with the “Security-Kid” which becomes a friendly household item that provides comfort when separated from familiar surroundings.
Materials explanation
“Security-Kid” is made completely out of fire-resistant materials. Up-cycled wool coats and blankets are used to make up the “Security-Kid” body. Even though it is unlikely that the “Security-Kid” will be exposed to embers, fire-safe materials help keep peace-of-mind and in tern reduce worry.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Task 5: Design for life
Task 5: Design for life
Phillip Stark’s television series is a competition of young designers to win a spot in his design firm for a period of time after the content. In the first episode Stark states: “we must have less and less product”. Stark’s approach to testing them involves asking them to find objects that have specific meaning. One student finds an ipod case and Stark deems this object “useless”. He wants to see what new insight they can convey through innovative thought. He says: “we don’t speak about design, we speak about creativity”.
Stark wants the students to be able to present their ideas. He claims this is his claim to success. He has them go out into the world and put themselves in others shoes. He also teaches them the importance of deadline. He wants his students to come up with affordable sustainable products that can benefit everyone. To help humanity achieve it’s potential.
I found Stark’s approach to his competition an interesting way to weed out designers. I was initially surprised at how little they knew of common design skills such as design sketching. Some of the students who were already working at design firms at good ideas but poorly communicated them. And I was surprised at how easy some of the tasks were. If Stark were to come into our design class he would be impressed!


